Abstract:Objective To study the efficacy and safety of multi-mode blood management in the primary revision hip arthroplasty. Methods Totally 27 patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia from January 2015 to July 2017. 13 patients with multi-mode blood management were enrolled in the experimental group, and the other 14 patients without multi-mode blood management were enrolled in the control group. The differences of age, sex and body mass index were compared between the experimental group and the control group. The preoperative hemoglobin, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin 2 days after operation, perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative drainage volume and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and other postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in age, sex and body mass index between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative hemoglobin, operative time or incidence of complications between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hemoglobin 2 days after operation and postoperative blood transfusion between the experimental group and control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Multimodal blood management can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative blood transfusion, and has no side effect in safety.