Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者单纯放疗、同步放化疗及同步 放化疗联合辅助化疗的预后分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

申良方,E-mail :slf1688@sina.com ;Tel :13975805137

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Prognostic analysis of intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 通过比较单纯放疗(IMRT)、同步放化疗(CCRT)及同步放化疗联合辅助化疗(CCRT+AC) 在Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者中的生存获益,来探索化疗是否能提高Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者生存率,为早期鼻咽癌治疗方式的 选择提供参考依据。方法 回顾性分析2009 年10 月—2013 年10 月中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科收治的122 例 初治Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者(T1、2N1M0、T2N0M0,第八版AJCC/UICC 鼻咽癌分期标准)的临床资料。其中, IMRT 组患者39 例,CCRT 组患者38 例,CCRT+AC 组患者45 例。主要研究终点为总生存期(OS)、无 局部复发生存期(LRFS)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)及无病生存期(DFS),次要研究终点为毒副反应。 结果 IMRT 组、CCRT 组、CCRT+AC 组患者5 年OS、LRFS、DMFS 及DFS 比较,差异无统计学意义 (P >0.05);但CCRT 组、CCRT+AC 组患者毒副反应(骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应)较IMRT 组更严重(P <0.05)。 结论 在IMRT 基础上加用化疗未能改善Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者的预后,反而增加毒副反应。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore whether chemotherapy can improve the survival rate of patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and provide a reference for the choice of treatment methods for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparing the survival benefit of three kinds of treatment methods: intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone (IMRT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT+AC) for stage Ⅱ nasopharyngeal carcinoma Methods The clinical data of 122 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with tumor in Xiangya Hospital from October 2009 to October 2013 were analyzed retrospectively (T1-2N1M0, T2N0M0, eighth edition of AJCC/UICC nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging standard). There were 39 patients in the IMRT group, 38 patients in the CCRT group, and 45 patients in the CCRT+AC group. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), no local recurrence survival (LRFS), no distant metastasis survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was toxicities. Results There was no significant difference in 5-year OS, LRFS, DMFS and DFS among the IMRT group, CCRT group and CCRT+AC group (P > 0.05). However, the side effects (bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal reaction) in the CCRT group and the CCRT+AC group were more serious than those in the IMRT group alone (P < 0.05). Conclusions On the basis of IMRT combined with chemotherapy failed to improve prognosis of stage Ⅱ nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, it increases adverse reaction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

佘磊,苏琳,申良方.Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者单纯放疗、同步放化疗及同步 放化疗联合辅助化疗的预后分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019,(12):88-92

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-06-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码