Abstract:Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and CABG combined with mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with coronary heart disease complicated with moderate and severe functional mitral regurgitation. Methods From June 2009 to April 2018, 106 elderly patients with coronary heart disease complicated with moderate and severe functional mitral regurgitation were divided into CABG group and CABG+MVR group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and mitral regurgitation area were examined before and after operation. The improvement of NYHA grade was evaluated, and the duration of hospitalization, ICU and cardiopulmonary bypass were recorded. Results The intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time, ascending aortic clamping time and postoperative ICU time in CABG?+?MVR group were significantly longer than those in CABG group (P?0.05), but there was no significant difference in the proportion of IABP use, hospital stay and perioperative mortality between two groups (P?>?0.05). One year after operation, the mitral regurgitation area and left ventricular end diastolic diameter decreased, left ventricular ejection fraction increased and NYHA cardiac function grade improved significantly in CABG group and CABG?+?MVR group (P?0.05). Conclusion CABG?+?MVR surgery can significantly improve cardiac function and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary heart disease complicated with moderate and severe functional mitral regurgitation.