Abstract:Objective To compare 69 cases of the preoperative diagnoses of atypical endometrial hyperplasia with the diagnoses after hysterectomies, and to analyze the reason for their inconsitency between the preoperative and postoperative diagnoses to improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy. Methods From January 2016 to December 2019, 69 cases of patients, who were underwent the hysterectomy on the basis of preoperative diagnoses of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, were recuited in Qinhuangdao Maternal and Child Health Hospital, and were retrospectively analyzed their clinical features, diagnostic methods, as well as the diagnostic complexity and inconsistence, between the preoperative and postoperative diagnoses. Results The preoperative diagnoses of 43 patients were identical to those of postoperation, with coincidence rate of 62.3% (43/69). 7 cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia disappeared and 8 cases of lesion were upgraded to endometrial carcinoma after surgery. 44 cases of lesion were located in anterior, posterior, and lateral walls of uterus. Multifocal lesions (63.8%) were in fundus and cornu uteri. Conclusions The normal and accurate first diagnostic process is crucial to avoiding misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses. The adequate and accurate dissection, and normal pathological diagnosis were essential to the diagnosis and therapy of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.