尿动力检测中尿道测压管对尿流率的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

孙超,E-mail :Yinfeng9803@sina.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Impact of intra-urethral catheter on uroflow rate in urodynamic test
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨前列腺增生(BPH)患者尿道内置F8 测压管在压力- 流率测定中对尿流率的影响。方法 对54 例良性BPH 患者行压力- 流率测定,尿道内放置F8 测压导管,比较尿流率和置管后尿流率的变化。结果 54 例患者置管前后最大尿流率、平均尿流率比较,经t 检验,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。置管前后尿流量比较,经t 检验,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。膀胱出口梗阻Ⅱ~Ⅳ级患者的最大尿流率与最大置管尿流率比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),0、Ⅰ级和Ⅴ、Ⅵ级的最大尿流率、最大置管尿流率比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论 BPH 患者尿道内置F8 测压导管影响尿流率测定值。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective To study the impact of intra-urethral catheter on uroflow rate in pressure-flow study. Methods Fifty-four men with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) underwent free uroflometry and pressureflow analysis respectively. With an F8 urethral catheter, the standard pressure-flow variables such as the maximum flow and catheter’s uroflow rate were measured and analyzed with paired t test. Results The maximum free uroflow rate and the mean free uroflow rate were significantly different before and after catheterization (P < 0.05). The maximum voided volume in free uroflometry and in pressure-flow study was not statistically different (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the maximum uroflow rate and the maximum catheter’s uroflow rate among the patients with bladder outlet obstruction of grade II-IV (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences among the patients with bladder outlet obstruction of grade 0, I, V and VI (P > 0.05). Conclusions F8 urethral catheter appears to have significant impact on uroflow rate.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

殷凤朝,李芳,孙超,刘丽辉,曹赫然,王学民,李忠,张晋.尿动力检测中尿道测压管对尿流率的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,(2):110-112

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-01-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码