新型气管插管内镜与直接喉镜的对比研究

Comparison of head-flexible endoscope with direct laryngoscope in rabbit endotracheal intubation

摘要:

摘要：目的  对头部可控气管插管内镜（HFS）与直接喉镜（DLS）在家兔经口气管插管术中的使用效果进行评价和比较。方法  选用新西兰大耳白兔共40只，随机均分为两组。分别采用DLS和HFS辅助气管插管法建立人工气道。比较两组一次插管成功率、建立人工气道的时间、插管并发症、平均动脉压变化情况。结果  HFS组插管成功率高于DLS组，气道建立时间较DLS组短。HFS组插管并发症发生率较DLS组低。HFS组在气道建立过程中血液动力学变化较DLS组低。结论  HFS对于优化家兔经口气管插管术作用明显。

Abstract:

Abstract: Objective To compare and evaluate efficiency of head-flexible endoscope (HFS) and direct laryngoscope (DLS) in setting up artificial airway in rabbit. Methods Forty New Zealand White rabbits were chosen and randomly divided into two groups. Artificial airway was respectively set up by DLS auxiliary tracheal intubation and HFS auxiliary tracheal intubation. The success rate of intubation, time of intubation, airway damage and change of mean arterial pressure were compared between the two groups. Results The intubation success rate of the HFS group was higher than that of the DLS; the time of intubation in the HFS group was shorter than that in the DLS group; the incidence of airway damage in the HFS group was lower than that in the DLS group. Hemodynamic changes of the HFS group in the process of intubation were fewer than those of the DLS group. Conclusions The HFS obviously optimizes the method of endotracheal intubation in rabbit.