Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze the effect of modified Soave radical operation and modified Duhamel radical operation in the treatment of children with congenital giant colon. Methods In this study, 118 cases of children with congenital giant colon treated in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 59 cases in each group. The control group was given modified Duhamel radical operation, and the observation group was given modified Soave radical operation. The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative fasting time, postoperative hospitalization, etc. were observed and recorded, and scores of quality of life, anal function and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results Operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative fasting time and postoperative hospitalization in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Scores of quality of life and anal function in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions The effect of modified Soave radical operation in the treatment of children with congenital giant colon is better than that of modified Duhamel radical operation, with few postoperative complications. It can improve anal function and quality of life, and it is worthy to be popularized.