团体心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

海南省医学科研基金资助项目(No:1421320.57A2004)


Effect of group psychotherapy on somatoform disorders
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的探讨团队心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者早期干预的疗效。方法选取2014 年10 月-2015 年1 月海南省儋州市农垦那大医院收治的躯体形式障碍患者97 例,依据随机数表法分为A 组(团体心理治疗32例)、B 组(药物治疗33 例)、C 组(团队心理治疗+ 药物治疗32 例),比较3 组患者的临床疗效和躯体形式症状筛查量表(SOMS-7)、大体评定量表(GAS)及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分。结果A组显效率为62.50%,好转率为81.25%;B 组显效率为63.64%,好转率为84.85%;C 组显效率为87.50%,好转率为96.88%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),C 组患者的显效率和好转率高于A、B 组。治疗前,3 组患者的SOMS-7 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周,A 组、B 组及C 组的SOMS-7 评分为(10.44±2.17)、(10.72±2.11)和(6.75±2.09)分,经方差分析,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。C 组的SOMS-7 评分低于A、B组。治疗前,3 组患者的GAS 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周,A 组、B 组及C 组的GAS 评分为(76.18±5.44)、(77.29±5.19)和(84.25±5.91)分,经检验,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。C 组的GAS 评分高于A、B组。3 组患者的HAMD评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周3 组患者的HAMD 评分比较,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),C组患者的HAMD评分低于A、B组。结论团体心理治疗联合药物使用在治疗躯体形式障碍方面成效好,能够改善患者精神状况及临床症状。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy of team psychotherapy for early intervention of somatoform disorders. Methods According to a random number, 97 patients with somatoform disorders treated in Danzhou Agricultural Reclamation Nada Hospital from October 2014 to January 2015 were assigned into group A (32 cases who received team psychotherapy), group B (33 cases who received medication) and group C (32 cases who received both team psychotherapy and medication). The clinical efficacy, Somatoform Symptoms Screening Scale (Chinese version SOMS-7) score, Global Assessment Scale (GAS) score and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score were campared among the three groups. Results In the group A, the effective rate was 62.50%, the improvement rate was 81.25%; in the group B, the effective rate was 63.64%, the improvement rate was 84.85%; in the group C, the effective rate was 87.50%, the improvement rate was 96.88%, the effective rate and the improvement rate of the group C were higher than those of the groups A and B (p <0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the SOMS-7 score among the three groups (p >0.05). In the 48th week after treatment, the SOMS-7 score of the groups A, B and C was (10.44 ±2.17),(10.72 ±2.11) and (6.75 ±2.09) respectively; the SOMS-7 score of the group C was lower than that of the group A and the group B (p < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the GAS score among the three groups (p > 0.05). In the 48th week after treatment, the GAS score of the groups A, B and C was (76.18 ±5.44), (77.29 ±5.19) and (84.25 ±5.91) respectively; the GAS score of the group C was higher than that of the group A and the group B (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the HAMD score among the three groups before treatment (p > 0.05). The HAMD score in the group C was lower than that in the group A and the group B (p < 0.05), and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions Combined use of group psychotherapy and drug has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of somatoform disorders, and can significantly improve patients' mental health and clinical symptoms.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

龚建兵,吴传东,刘向华.团体心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,(23):57-60

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-10-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码