2009、2012版国家基本药物目录与云南省“新农合”药物目录的比较研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

蓝海,E-mail:lanhai8696@126.com;Tel:0872-2257414

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(No:81260512);云南省哲学社科规划课题(No:YB2012041);云南省教育厅重点项目(No:2015C010Z)


Comparative study of 2009, 2012 edition National Essential Medicine List and "New Rural Cooperative" drug list of Yunnan province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的  通过比较两版基药目录与“新农合”目录的变化,分析两类目录的联系和差异,为促进云南省“新农合”药物目录的完善及与基药目录的对接提供参考。方法  对两类目录中化学药品和生物制品中的药物分类、数量及重合率进行比较。结果  两类目录存在归类不同、细分类别不同和品种增减变化等差异。结论  12版基药目录在分类依据、收载药品及疾病覆盖等方面更为科学化,但两类目录重合率偏低,不利于医保政策的衔接。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare and analyze the change of directory in the two edition of National Essential Medicine List (NEML) and "New Rural Cooperative" (NRC), and to  promote the perfection of NRC directory of Yunnan province and provide a base reference for the list of drug docking. Methods Classification, quantity and the coincidence rate of chemical drugs and biological products in two kinds of directory were compared. Results There were differences in categories, classifications, subdivisions of different varieties changes in two kinds of directory. Conclusions The 2012 edition of NEML is more scientific in the classification, drug containing and disease coverage. But coincidence rate of two kinds of directory is low, which is not conducive to the cohesion and the health insurance policy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨晓莉,李茂莲,朱丽琼,杨亮蕊,蓝海.2009、2012版国家基本药物目录与云南省“新农合”药物目录的比较研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2016,(8):87-90

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-26
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码