Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze the clinical curative effect of two different wire binding technologies combined with artificial joint replacement for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Retrospectively analyzed 34 cases of elderly patients with femoral Intertrochanteric fractures treated with different wire binding technologies combined with artificial joint replacement in our hospital from 2013 to 2014. A number of 15 cases used double loop wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement (group 1), and 19 cases used ordinary wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement (group 2). Indexes indicated the recovery situation of two groups were comparative analyzed. Results Compared with the group 1, the group 2 had significantly extended postoperative first walking time, postoperative hospital stays, and the Harris scoring of patients after surgery 1 month (P < 0.05). But the two groups had no difference in the harrisscoring of patients after surgery 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year (P > 0.05). The blood test index of the two groups had no difference either (P > 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the group used ordinary wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement, the group used double loop wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement can promote a faster recovery process, and reduce postoperative hospital stay time, and improve the hip joint's function in short term.