肾部分切除术后近期术侧肾功能损失的危险因素及预测模型构建
作者:
作者单位:

江南大学附属医院 泌尿外科, 江苏 无锡 214000

中图分类号:

R737.11

基金项目:

江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(No:BK20211395)


Risk factors and predictive model for short-term ipsilateral renal function loss after partial nephrectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Urology, Jiangnan University Affiliated Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析肾部分切除术(PN)后近期术侧肾功能损失的危险因素,并以此构建预测模型进行验证。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月—2023年12月江南大学附属医院收治的107例行PN治疗的患者的临床资料,根据患者术后近期术侧肾功能损失发生情况将其分为损失组(27例)和无损失组(80例)。采用多因素逐步Logistic回归模型分析影响患者术后术侧肾功能损失的危险因素,并以此构建Nomogram列线图模型预测患者术后肾功能损失的发生风险;绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析该模型对患者术后肾功能损失的预测效能。结果 损失组肿瘤最大径、R.E.N.A.L评分、热缺血占比、缺血时间> 45 min占比均高于无损失组,肾体积保留率低于无损失组(P <0.05)。多因素逐步Logistic回归分析结果显示,R.E.N.A.L评分[O^R=5.609(95% CI:2.710,11.606)]、缺血类型[O^R=4.462(95% CI:1.978,10.064)]是PN患者术后近期术侧肾功能损失的危险因素(P <0.05);肾体积保留率[O^R=0.285(95% CI:0.098,0.826)]是保护因素(P <0.05)。基于上述影响因素构建的列线图预测模型经Bootstrap法内部验证,结果显示,C-index指数为0.852(95% CI:0.783,0.964),预测患者肾功能损失的校正曲线趋近于理想曲线(P >0.05)。列线图模型预测患者肾功能损失的敏感性为88.90%(95% CI:0.791,0.984)、特异性为91.20%(95% CI:0.841,0.994)。结论 基于影响因素构建的列线图预测模型可较好地评估患者PN术后近期术侧肾功能损失的发生风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the risk factors of short-term renal function loss of the operated side after partial nephrectomy (PN), and to construct and verify a prediction model based on this, in order to provide some guidance for improving postoperative renal function of patients.Methods The clinical data of 107 patients who underwent PN in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into renal function loss group (27 cases) and non-renal function loss group (80 cases) according to the occurrence of renal function loss on the operated side after operation. The risk factors affecting postoperative renal function loss of the surgical side of patients were analyzed, and a Nomogram model was constructed to predict the risk of postoperative renal function loss of patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to analyze the predictive efficiency of the prediction model for postoperative renal function loss of patients.Results The maximum tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L score, the proportion of warm ischemia type and the proportion of ischemic time > 45 min in the loss group were higher than those in the non-loss group, and the renal volume preservation rate was lower than that in the non-loss group (P <0.05). Multivariate stepwise Logistic regression analysis showed that R.E.N.A.L score [O^R = 5.609 (95% CI: 2.710, 11.606) ], ischemic type [O^R = 4.462 (95% CI: 1.978, 10.064) were the risk factors of postoperative short-term renal function loss in PN patients (P < 0.05). Renal volume preservation rate [O^R = 0.285 (95% CI: 0.098, 0.826) ] was a protective factor (P < 0.05). The nomogram prediction model based on the above influencing factors was internally verified by the Bootstrap method, and the C-index index was 0.852 (95% CI: 0.783, 0.964), and the calibration curve for predicting renal function loss of patients was close to the ideal curve (P > 0.05). ROC showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the nomogram model in predicting renal function loss were 88.90% (95% CI: 0.791, 0.984) and 91.20% (95% CI: 0.841, 0.994), respectively.Conclusion R.E.N.A.L score and ischemia type are independent risk factors for postoperative short-term renal function loss in PN patients, and renal volume preservation rate is an independent protective factor. The nomogram prediction model based on this model can better evaluate the risk of short-term renal function loss on the operated side after PN.

    图1 肾功能损失发生风险的列线图模型Fig.1
    图2 列线图模型验证曲线Fig.2
    图3 评估列线图模型预测效能的ROC曲线Fig.3
    表 1 两组患者临床资料比较Table 1
    表 2 影响患者PN术后近期术侧肾功能损失的多因素逐步Logistic回归分析参数Table 2
    参考文献
    [1] NAITO S, KATO T, TSUCHIYA N. Surgical and focal treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a literature review[J]. Int J Urol, 2022, 29(6): 494-501.
    [2] PALLAUF M, GED Y, SINGLA N. Molecular differences in renal cell carcinoma between males and females[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(7): 1727-1739.
    [3] YOSHIDA K, KOBARI Y, IIZUKA J, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with severe chronic kidney disease[J]. Int J Urol, 2022, 29(11): 1349-1355.
    [4] RODRíGUEZ FERNáNDEZ E, CARDO A L, SUBIRá RíOS D, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: our experience and literature review[J]. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed), 2022, 46(8): 481-486.
    [5] 王胤钊, 陈敏丰, 李杨乐, 等. 3D打印技术应用于肾部分切除术术前评估中的临床意义[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2022, 47(3): 328-333.
    [6] DENG H, FAN Y, YUAN F F, et al. Partial nephrectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes and better renal function preservation than radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2021, 47(1): 46-60.
    [7] 何康, 邱学德, 马金鹏, 等. 肾细胞癌患者肾部分切除术后肾功能的影响因素研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(24): 104-107.
    [8] 吴侠, 宋红娟, 刘晴晴, 等. 局部晚期宫颈癌患者新辅助化疗疗效的影响因素及预测模型研究[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2023, 33(20): 14-19.
    [9] 国家癌症中心, 国家肿瘤质控中心肾癌质控专家委员会. 中国肾癌规范诊疗质量控制指标(2022版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2022, 44(12): 1256-1261.
    [10] KUTIKOV A, UZZO R G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 844-853.
    [11] MOTZER R J, RUSSO P, GRüNWALD V, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo for localised renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy (CheckMate 914): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 401(10379): 821-832.
    [12] SUN Z J, LIU F, WEI H B, et al. Laparoscopic partial versus radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma over 4 cm[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2023, 149(20): 17837-17848.
    [13] HU X, WANG Y H, SHAO Y X, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy for T1 non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2023, 49(8): 1519-1523.
    [14] 梁磊, 王毓斌, 邵晋凯. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术后影响早期肾功能变化因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(10): 1581-1585.
    [15] 朱森强, 郝元元, 毕然, 等. 机器人辅助下肾部分切除术后患者肾功能保留和三连胜结局的影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2023, 49(6): 1569-1577.
    [16] HU C, SUN J L, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Parallel comparison of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and C-index scoring systems in predicting outcomes after partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(15): 5062-5077.
    [17] 常瑞亭, 孙瑞雪, 于天舒, 等. MAP评分联合R.E.N.A.L评分在肾部分切除术中的运用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2021, 37(1): 88-92.
    [18] 韩松辰, 宋宇轩, 戴翔, 等. 热缺血时间对腹腔镜肾部分切除术后肾功能的影响[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(5): 350-354.
    [19] 张宗勤, 王正, 刘冰, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术中冰水肾脏降温对肾功能的保护效果[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(46): 3799-3803.
    [20] 卢灿峰, 刘刚, 窦中岭. 后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中热缺血时间对肾肿瘤患者肾功能及并发症的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2021, 19(23): 2440-2442.
    [21] KOBAYASHI S, CHO B, MUTAGUCHI J, et al. Surgical navigation improves renal parenchyma volume preservation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score matched comparative analysis[J]. J Urol, 2020, 204(1): 149-156.
    [22] 黄奕昕, 邹湘鹏, 张志凌, 等. 肾部分切除术后术侧近期肾功能保留的相关因素分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(12): 1099-1103.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

邓圆圆,吴升,向从明.肾部分切除术后近期术侧肾功能损失的危险因素及预测模型构建[J].中国现代医学杂志,2025,35(1):62-67

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:15
  • 下载次数: 5
  • HTML阅读次数: 3
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-19
文章二维码